Test the structure while it's still cheap to change
Wireframes catch structural problems early: a page trying to do too much, or a form flow that doesn't match how people think. We treat them as low-cost experiments to test on end users, to check we've met their needs.
They also show what matters most on each page, and where each component and function goes.
What you get:
- Problems found early. Structural fixes cost little at this stage.
- A shared blueprint. Stakeholders, designers, and developers work from the same page layouts.
- A quicker path to design. Convivial's Figma component library lets us build medium-fidelity wireframes fast.
Our approach to wireframing
Frequently asked questions
Wireframes aren't mainly about visual style, which the design system covers. They validate content structure, page layout, and user flow before you invest in full visual design. That catches structural problems while they're still cheap to fix.
After discovery and information architecture have identified the pages and templates you need and what each contains, and before full visual design and development. Wireframing before the structure is settled tends to be redone.
Yes. Reviewing designs and wireframes for accessibility before the build, not only testing after launch, is standard practice for an accessibility-first team. Structural decisions such as heading hierarchy, form grouping, and navigation are much cheaper to get right early.
A wireframe shows structure: what goes where, in what order, and how people move between pages. A visual design applies your brand: colour, type, imagery, and style.
Case studies
Latest insights