Make the expensive decisions early, on evidence
Platform choices, such as GovCMS SaaS or PaaS, and content model decisions are costly to change mid-build. Discovery bases them on evidence, so your scope and cost rest on what we've learned, not on assumption.
Skipping it usually brings the same questions back later, at higher cost.
What you get:
- A shared definition of success. Stakeholders and the delivery team describe it the same way.
- A project roadmap. Priorities and requirements that reflect real user needs.
- Scope you can trust. A recommended approach, with enough detail to scope the build with confidence.
Our approach to discovery
Frequently asked questions
Discovery uncovers business goals and user needs before design or development starts, through stakeholder interviews, user research, and content and technical audits. That way, scope, cost, and platform decisions, such as GovCMS SaaS or PaaS, rest on evidence rather than assumption. Skipping it tends to surface the same questions later, at higher cost, mid-build.
It depends on complexity. A straightforward content site may need a short, focused discovery, while a large transformation with multiple data sources and stakeholder groups can run considerably longer. The length is set by how many unknowns genuinely exist, not by a fixed template.
Typically a clear statement of user needs and business goals, a recommended approach covering platform, information architecture direction, and integration needs, and enough detail to scope the build with confidence. Discovery should reduce the risk of decisions that are expensive to get wrong later, particularly platform and content model choices.
Case studies
Latest insights